BADAGA KOLA [CLAN]
The various clans and their totems are as follows:
1. Forefathers of Solur Group – NAGA (COBRA)
2. Forefathers of Thoodagur Group – ANEY (ELEPHANT)
3. Forefathers of Doddur Group – MARI (GODDESS MARI)
4. Forefathers of Sinnakunnur – Kethi – Kundha Group –
KASTURI (MUSK DEER)
5. Forefathers of Hebbanadu – Halhattane – Thangadu Group –
MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE STONE)
Forefathers of Meekeri – Ithalar – Balakola Group – MANIKKA
(CARBUNCLE STONE)
Forefathers of Horanally – Porthy Group – MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE
STONE)
Forefathers of Bembatti – Belida Group – MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE
STONE)
Forefathers of Kasoley-Mandhanai Group – MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE
STONE)
Forefathers of Jakkanarai Group – MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE STONE)
Forefathers of Kateri Ajjur Group – MANIKKA (CARBUNCLE
STONE)
6. Forefathers of Adhikari Group – KOVERU (WHITE HORSE)
7. Forefathers of Kagguchchi- Jagadala Group – BELLIE
(SILVER)
8. Forefathers of Pannemanai-Kenduva Group – SELANDI
(SPIDER)
9. Forefathers of Porangadu Group – MADHUVA (HONEY BEE).
Each clan is exogamous, i.e., man belonging to one clan
cannot marry the girls of the same clans as they are the descendants from the
same ancestors. Men of one clan can marry girls of different clans affiliated
to different totem.
Direct words from from his piece -
“It is claimed that the main merkunadu group,viz, the
Hebanad-Halatanai-Thangadu group and the Jakkanarai group are descended from
the same forefather. The Late A.N. Kadagowder, former Moniagar of Merkunad,
Denad Village and the Late.M.Doddayya Gowder of Halattanai informed the author
(Late.Thyagi.K.P.Raju Gowder) that the forefather of the Jakkanarai group of
the Badagas was uterine brother of Huliajja, Guruajja and Haraajja, the
forefathers of the main group of the merkunad people. The Jakkanarai forefather
Batti Hettappa joined the Porangadu forefathers at Thalaimalai and accompanied
them to Betalada where he married Yelingi Amma, the sister of 7 forefathers of
Porangadu people. The above informants asserted that they belong to the MANIKA
CLAN.”
‘I want to know if it is wrong in marrying a person
with no moray’
This question, though appears to be simple, is an important
one since many of us, including the self – appointed GOWDAS in every village or
for that matter, many ‘old people like me’ are not clear and sure about this
aspect.
There seems to be a ‘raging‘ discussion going on
in FB Badagas Group.
Let me answer dharshani’s question to the best of my
knowledge.
What is Moray (relationship)?
In simple terms, Badagas, [being a very small community],
have evolved, over the centuries, a system in which marriages are not ‘fixed’ –
call it arranged if you want, between certain hattis (villages) since the
‘blood’ relationship among them is considered to be very ‘close – anna
thamma moray’.
How this could have happened is, like, in olden days, one
brother deciding to move away from the hatti he was born in to establish a
‘new’ hatti for various reasons. For example, a brother from Hubbathalay could
have moved to Eethoray. Hence, the male children of the elder bro X in
Hubbathalay would/could not marry the female children of younger brother Y in
Eethorai as they are considered brother and sister (being the children of two
brothers).
Hence, Hubbathalay hatti has no moray for marriages with
Eethoray.
This brings us to the grouping of various hattis into Ooru
[communes] and Seemay.
So,where do we start to check about ‘Moray’?
Since, time immemorial, every Badaga belonged to a village,
irrespective of his place of residence. For example, Kada [now, Srivasa
Ramachandra] and Kangi [Lokeswari Renuka] are the son and daughter of
Bhoja and Laxmi , living in Ooty [this can be, Bangalore, London or
Boston in USA]. Since Bhoja is the son of Rama Gowder of ‘Hannu Mora Hatti’ [
or Jakkadha, Dhavani or Ketchigatti for that matter], Kada and Kangi belong to
HM Hatti for practical or rather, moray purposes. By the way, in olden days,
all Badagas belonging to Gowda [group] were known as Bellie Gowder, Ari Gowder
etc.
So all the youngsters of HM Hatti are brothers and sisters.
Marrying among themselves is, thus prohibited.
Now, our ancestors, being wise men of yonder, grouped
certain hattis into communes called OORU. These hattis need not be very close
to each other. The number of hattis forming a ooru need not be of a specific
number. The next grouping done by our forefathers is forming a SEEMAY. Hence, a
Seemay contains a few Oorus [which in turn has many villages]. And our Muthe
Muhappa [the first of the ancestors] divided the Nilgiris into Nakku Betta
[Four Mountains/massifs] to where all the Badagas belong to. See the division
of Seemays and hattis in my websites here – Hattis, Ooru & Seemay.
To put simply, a cluster of closely built houses formed a
street -thara, [the thatched and later country tiled houses have common walls).
A few tharas formed a hatti with well defined and demarcated
areas like 'Dhodda Manay' [big house- literally], ‘suthu kallu’ [mostly with a
bikka mora (olive tree), gudi [temple],hanay [grass ground] etc.
A few hattis to Ooru. A few oorus to Seemay.
Four seemays namely 1)Thodha Naadu 2)Porangaadu 3)Mekku
Naadu 4) Kunde [Naadu], to NAAKKUBETTA.
And now to specifics
As far as MORAY for marriages are concerned,
a) A girl/boy cannot marry a boy/girl from the same
hatti to which they both belong to .
b) A girl/boy cannot marry a boy/girl from the same
Ooru to which they both belong to.
c) BUT A GIRL/BOY CAN MARRY A BOY/GIRL FROM THE SAME
SEEMAY TO WHICH
THEY BOTH BELONG TO.
There is a wrong impression that you cannot marry from the
same seemay.
No comments:
Post a Comment